Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/20/1999 07:30 PM House FIN
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
GENERAL SUBJECT (S): LONG TERM FISCAL GAP DISCUSSION The following overview was taken in log note format. Tapes and handouts will be on file with the House Finance Committee through the 21st Legislative Session, contact 465-2156. After the 21st Legislative Session they will be available through the Legislative Library at 465- 3808. Time Meeting Convened: 7:30 p.m. Tape(s): HFC 99 - 90, Side 1 HFC 99 - 91, Side 1 HFC 99 - 90, Side 1 PRESENT: X Representative G. Davis X Co-Chair Therriault X Representative Foster X Co-Chair Mulder X Representative Grussendorf X Vice Chair Bunde X Representative Kohring X Representative Austerman Absent Representative Moses X Representative J. Davies X Representative Williams ALSO PRESENT: REPRESENTATIVE SHARON CISSNA; REPRESENTATIVE ETHAN BERKOWITZ; PETER BUSHRE, CHIEF FINANCIAL INVESTMENT OFFICER, ALASKA PERMANENT FUND CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; JIM KELLY, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICAITONS, ALASKA PERMANENT FUND CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. LOG SPEAKER DISCUSSION 000 BEGIN TAPE 90, SIDE 1 JIM KELLY, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS, ALASKA PERMANENT FUND CORPORATION Provided members with copies of their power point slide presentation, Alaska Permanent Fund: Long-Term Investment Considerations (copy on file). 287 Mr. Kelly Observed that the focus of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC) is investment management not public policy. Reviewed charts 5 (growth of the fund since inception) and 6 (distribution of the fund income since inception. CO-CHAIR THERRIAULT Noted that the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation got into the political problem of making loans. 403 MR. KELLY Stressed that inflation proofing was adopted to become more economical. 450 Mr. Kelly Noted savings for future generations. Explained that it is not likely that existing investment and distribution structures would work as well in the future due to increased volatility in capital markets. Discussed volatility in capital markets. 516 Mr. Kelly Compared returns over the last 15 years. 540 Vice-Chair Bunde Noted that the perimeters of investment have been discussed. Asked how this has affected returns. Mr. Kelly Observed that the fund would have increased by an additional 10 percent if legislation had been acted on. 604 Mr. Kelly Noted that accounting standards have changed. Discussed the earnings reserve account on chart 10. Explained that there are discrepancies with state law and federal reporting standards. 674 Mr. Kelly Discussed chart 11. There is an inconsistency between current generally accepted accounting principles and state law. Research by Morrison and Forester and KPMG showed that the conflict arises in regards to the definition of income available for distribution. Concluded that legislation is needed to resolve the conflict. 785 Mr. Kelly Reviewed chart 12. Noted that the lines have crossed between oil revenue and fund income. 840 Mr. Kelly Reviewed objectives listed in chart 13: maximize long-term total return, maximize annual spending distributions, preserve the real value of the Fund and the distributions, and maximize the stability and predictability of spending distributions. Mr. Kelly Stressed that if you want to preserve the real value of the Fund, must not spend over the real rate of return on your investments over the long term. 927 Mr. Kelly Reviewed the change in the capital market returns and asset allocation. The state will get a 7.75 percent return without changes. If HB 156 were passed then rate of return would be increased to 7.94 percent. HB 156 was amended in House State Affairs Committee. If the State Affairs version passes it would increase assets to 8.13 percent. 1074 Mr. Kelly Reviewed chart 19. Concluded that the Fund would earn between $67 - $73 billion dollars. 1119 Co-Chair Mulder Asked what would happen if all restrictions were removed. 1134 Mr. Kelly Noted that it would not be prudent to invest 100 percent. He observed that there are funds that earn upwards of 50 - 60 percent. 1186 Peter Bushre, Chief Financial Investment Officer, Department of Revenue Noted that trustees would make asset allocations. They would have flexibility to better maximize returns. 1273 Mr. Kelly Concluded that greater options would be helpful. 1315 Mr. Kelly Observed that the fund is currently $26.3 billion dollars. Co-Chair Therriault Questioned what is Alaskan CD. Mr. Bushre Explained that there are certificates of deposits in Alaskan banks. It allows diversification. Representative G. Davis Asked the amount of real estate. 1407 Mr. Bushre Discussed real estate owned by the Corporation. 1450 Mr. Bushre Observed that the value of the fund has grown by $1 billion dollars in three months. Mr. Bushre Pointed out that the fund is made up of principle and income. He explained that the principle comes from a variety of sources including constitutionally mandated deposits and legislative appropriations. Discussed items recognized by state law. Under today's accounting standards earnings reserve would be higher from unrealized gains. 1628 Mr. Bushre When legislature passes a bill to appropriate earnings reserve $2.8 billion would be moved. 1660 Mr. Bushre Reviewed chart 24. He observed that investments are a mixture of stocks, bonds and real estate. 1685 Mr. Bushre Discussed the priority of permanent fund uses defined by statute (AS 37.12.140 and 145). Dividends are first calculated and paid then an amount of income sufficient to offset the effect of inflation is transferred to the principle. 1713 Representative Austerman If there is not enough cash the unrealized earnings can not be used. 1739 Vice-Chair Bunde If earnings reserve were changed would the dividend be calculated on the entire amount? 1770 Mr. Bushre Stressed that unrealized gains create inflation. A change in the law would put accounting standards on an even footing. 1804 Mr. Bushre Best interest in the state to work from an earnings reserve balance that conforms to proper accounting standards. 1835 Vice-Chair Bunde Expressed concern that it would rocket the permanent fund dividend. 1839 Mr. Bushre Encouraged the distribution to be based on percentage of market value to create a more stable distribution. 1859 Vice-Chair Bunde Expressed concern that it would open a Pandora's box. 1878 Representative Austerman First option is to cap the permanent fund then make a change to the earnings reserve. 1912 Ethan What is the rate of return for various components of the fund? Mr. Kelly Stocks 9.4 to 10. Bonds 8.6. 1949 Mr. Bushre Reviewed current law for the calculation of the permanent fund dividend. Reviewed calculations for past dividends on chart 27. 1987 Mr. Bushre Reviewed chart 28 to show the 1998 dividend calculations. 2005 Mr. Bushre Emphasized the danger if there is a bad year. Results were shown on charts 29 and 30. Mr. Bushre Noted that the second calculation has not had to be used. They would not be able to inflation proof. 2122 Mr. Bushre Discussed inflation proofing on chart 31. The rate is applied to the principal. 2167 Mr. Kelly Reviewed chart 24. 2175 Representative Grussendorf Questioned what would happen if inflation proofing was done before the dividend was paid. 2207 Mr. Bushre Observed that there would be a very small dividend. Representative J. Davies Noted that the only part of the dividend that is inflation proofed is the principle. 2278 Mr. Bushre Explained that inflation proofing does not require movement outside of the fund. Its purpose is to take money off the appropriation table and to maintain the value of the fund. 2343 Mr. Bushre Reviewed the formula for inflation proofing, charts 33 and 34. 2375 Representative Foster Noted that permanent fund dividends have been lower in some years than in the previous year. 2400 Mr. Bushre Explained that the rate of inflation was greater in some years. (Tape Change, HFC 99 - 90, Side 2) 048 Co-Chair Mulder Clarified that they are projecting 3 percent inflation. 099 Representative Austerman Is there unrecognized inflation in the growth of the fund? 134 Mr. Bushre Appreciation in the market value includes the impact of inflation but current law does not allow it to be recognized. 222 Mr. Bushre Discussed distribution of income based on percentage of market value (POMV), chart 35. Discussed history of POMV. 310 Mr. Kelly Reviewed changes made in New Mexico, chart 36. 465 Mr. Kelly Discussed distribution of income based on percentage of market value. 534 Mr. Bushre Stressed that 70 percent of endowment funds use percentage of market value. It creates a more stable distribution. Co-Chair Mulder Concluded that there would be greater stability and less volatility. 590 Mr. Kelly Pointed out advantages of POMV. There is a connection between distribution and investment policies. 660 Mr. Kelly Reviewed the Trustee's Policies: Alaskans Speak Out on Public Policy Choices (copy on file). 781 Mr. Kelly Provided members with Attachment 2, (copy on file). 790 Mr. Kelly Discussed charts 1 and 2. 855 Mr. Kelly Noted that the world provides risks through volatility. 888 Mr. Kelly Reviewed chart 10. Noted that the greatest return offers the greatest risk. 935 Mr. Kelly Noted that the permanent fund does not grow in a straight line. There are times when the earnings reserve goes away. And the amount that can be paid out is reduced. 988 Mr. Kelly Noted that inflation proofing can not be paid in years where there are reductions to dividends. 1010 Mr. Kelly Problems with current law is that if there is a bad year inflation proofing would not be as safe as under distribution based on percentage of market value. 1070 Mr. Kelly Reviewed chart 16, which demonstrates a range of payouts. 1174 Mr. Kelly Discussed charts 17 and 18. He noted that the status quo is used to look at three scenarios. 1212 Mr. Kelly He reviewed the three scenarios on charts 19, 20 and 21. 1286 Mr. Kelly Discussed distribution based on the dividend, charts 22 - 25. 1344 Mr. Kelly Reviewed scenarios in charts 27 - 30. 1369 Co-Chair Mulder Questioned if the earnings are 8.5, 3 percent would be held for inflation. 5.5 percent would be paid in dividends. Referred to Chart 29 1430 Mr. Kelly Reviewed chart 29. Shows the difference of moving earnings reserve from the fund. 1469 Mr. Kelly Stressed that the point is where in the fund the money is left, principle or earnings reserve. 1488 Vice-Chair Bunde All the money is invested at the same time. Mr. Bushre In hard times the POMV would also drop. 1520 Vice-Chair Bunde The money would be available to fund state government if there is hard times. Co-Chair Mulder Questioned availability of funds. Assumption is that there is some amount of discipline. 1628 Discussion occurred regarding the earnings reserve. 1632 Mr. Kelly Spoke to inflation proofing. Debated if it should be 4.5% or 5%. Must check the medium rate of return. In the fifth year it could be $29 billion dollars rate of return. That would be 4.5% pay off. If it were kept in the earnings reserve account, more would be paid out but would be earning more money. 1732 Mr. Kelly Spoke to the earnings reserve balance and the base case range of results. It would improve if the reserve account were inflation proofed. The earnings reserve could be available to pay the dividend. 1791 Mr. Kelly Reviewed charts 46 - 48. 1888 Mr. Bushre Explained that the only way POMV will work is if no more is distributed. 1929 Mr. Bushre The purpose of inflation proofing is to make sure that it is not distributed. 1955 Mr. Kelly Reviewed charts 50 and 51. 1975 Mr. Kelly Concluded findings on chart 54. The permanent fund can support its three objectives under the current distribution formula across most markets. A POMV distribution of income can result in a more stable distribution stream than the current income based distribution rule. 2041 Representative Foster Reviewed the document, Alaskans Speak Out on Public Policy Choices. Co-Chair Mulder There were 585 thousand applications for permanent fund dividends in 1998. They are predicting just under than 600 thousand applications in 1999. Mr. Kelly Pointed out that 2/3 thirds of the fund would not be there without legislative appropriation. 2144 Mr. Bushre Pointed out that without the legislature the fund would be only a third of its current size. 2159 Vice-Chair Bunde Noted that change is threatening to many people. Asked what the Corporation can do to assist public perception. 2184 Mr. Bushre Observed that the Corporation thinks that POMV is the best way to protect the Fund. 2235 Vice-Chair Bunde Noted that the Corporation is requesting statutory changes. 2332 Mr. Kelly Would like to see a structural change that makes sense. Representative J. Davies Stated that he is convinced that this would be good structural change. 2364 Representative Williams What would be the ideal amount in the earnings reserve Mr. Kelly Noted that $2 billion is too little. At $6 billion there is not a problem 9 times out of 10. (Tape Change, HFC 99 - 91, Side 1) 076 Representative J. Davies Clarified that the basis is to pay the inflation proofing. 131 Representative Austerman Referred to the All Alaskan Plan. He noted that the plan would also be a POMV. 172 Mr. Kelly Emphasized that the numbers need to be reviewed to see if the pay averages. 201 Vice-Chair Bunde Noted that under the All Alaskan Plan the dividend would not survive. 227 Mr. Kelly Observed that the percentage of the dividend would have to be negotiated under all plans. 273 Co-Chair Mulder ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m. HOUSE FINANCE COMMITTEE LOG NOTES April 20, 1999 HFC 7 4/20/99
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|